The smart car market is like a collapsing star. After experiencing a stable period of inward curling, it begins to expand at a speed and posture that people cannot understand.

The way cars are built has changed, and the behavior of car people has also changed. When traffic affects emotions more than people’s desire for facts, the golden age of “Internet celebrity” companies has arrived. This is a terrible omen.

Private images inside Ideal and Gaohe cars exposed

Summary of the incident : Recently, some media reported that the private behaviors performed by Lili and Gaohe car owners in the car were filmed by the car’s built-in camera and exposed on the Internet.

In this regard, both companies stated that they have strict privacy confidentiality measures. At the same time, the two companies also questioned that this was a rumor-mongering video.

Comment : The two companies’ in-car cameras have been accused of taking indecent photos and circulating them online. These incidents not only affected the reputations of the two companies, but more importantly, they triggered thinking about personal privacy protection in the era of smart cars.

Both companies responded to the incident, insisting that the in-car cameras of their vehicles cannot remotely access or store images, and have reported the case to the public security organs to hold the rumor mongers legally accountable. However, this incident still triggered strong public concerns about the security of personal data and privacy in the era of smart cars and Internet of Vehicles.

In fact, on October 1, 2021, the "Several Provisions on Automobile Data Security Management (Trial)" has already been implemented. The regulations were jointly issued by the Cyberspace Administration of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Transport. It is China's first regulation for automobiles. Regulations established for data security. It aims to standardize automobile data processing activities, protect the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations, and safeguard national security and social public interests. The "Regulations" encourage automotive data processors to adhere to data processing principles such as "in-car processing", "no collection by default", "accuracy range applicable", and "desensitization processing" when carrying out automotive data processing activities.

However, in the above incident, the user may have inadvertently authorized certain data collection behaviors without knowing it, just like the App on the mobile phone may also unintentionally obtain various permissions.

In this case, car companies cannot avoid liability in privacy leaks by saying "we do not collect by default" or "users have confirmed that they can collect". Otherwise, car companies are equivalent to collecting privacy in the name of "respecting privacy".

Of course, there is another theory in the industry that someone deliberately filmed, copied and exposed privacy in order to "blackball" Gao Hehe's ideals. In this regard, I would like to say that if everything is interpreted in a conspiracy theory without using positive logic to improve one's business processes, then normal production and operations will be impossible to carry out.

Tesla cuts 10% of global layoffs

Event overview : Recently, Tesla announced 10% of its global layoffs, involving more than 10,000 people.

Comment : Musk clearly explained the reasons for the layoffs in an internal email. Although he "hates layoffs," his butt determines his head. When the company's performance stagnates or even declines, the top leader's decision to lay off employees is the most direct way to get the company back on track. Every working person should have a deep understanding of this.

The next question about who should be laid off is the repetitive positions that are not unique. Employees who perform poorly in those homogeneous positions will face being laid off.

People are not machines, and not everyone can perform work in strict accordance with rules and regulations. What Tesla needs is not only people who can strictly carry out their job responsibilities, but also people who are self-motivated.

As a company known for its "efficiency", Tesla also lays off employees very quickly. Some employees even said that the procedure was completed in 5 minutes. There was even news online that he was notified of layoffs just three days after joining the company, but received "N+3" compensation. According to word of mouth circulating on the Internet, laid-off employees at Tesla generally believe that their working experience at the company is "positive."

This year, the automotive industry is under a lot of pressure. Many companies are on the verge of bankruptcy, and news of layoffs has become a "routine". However, it is rare to be able to turn layoff news into "positive news" like Tesla. If this happens to a new power company, the car company will inevitably issue a statement after arguing with its employees, crying that starting a business is not easy, but it should be done and cherished.

In this regard, although Chinese startups completely crush overseas companies in terms of wolf culture, the gap is still huge in terms of humanitarianism and workplace norms.

The external reasons behind Tesla's layoffs of 10,000 people are actually not difficult to guess. The global trend of pure electric vehicles has cooled down, and comments encouraging diversified new energy paths have emerged: China's electric vehicles continue to iterate rapidly, and their competitiveness is far behind the world at a speed visible to the naked eye. mainstream level.

If Tesla doesn't sell well, it will have to cut costs. Laying off employees is definitely better than dragging it down. And this kind of generous layoffs is not negative news in my opinion.

Porsche responds with "tribute" to Xiaomi SU7 design

Summary of the event : Since the appearance design of Xiaomi SU7 is similar to that of Porsche Panamera, some media asked Porsche China President Ke Shimai what he thought about it. He replied: "As for the similarities between Xiaomi SU7 and Porsche, I think it may be a good idea. "We always look forward to fair, just, honest and legal competition between companies that apply the same standards or even higher requirements."

Comment : When the reporter asked Michael Kirsch, President and CEO of Porsche China, Xiaomi’s legal counsel’s fingers were probably hanging on the keyboard, waiting for the foreign company executive to say something “inappropriate”. in order to carry out a series of professional responses.

There is no doubt about the emotional intelligence and structure of Porsche executives. Kosmai's witty words are like using cotton belly to resolve an Eighteen Dragon Subduing Palm, leaving the legal staff with no place to use their strength and letting the good guys vent their full emotions. gas.

Think about it, Porsche had nothing to do against the former Zotye division, Honda's lawsuit against Shuanghuan was "counterattacked", and Land Rover's lawsuit against Landwind took 10 years to win.

Netizens have a saying that in the past, imitation was just copycatting, while today’s imitation is called tribute. The biggest celebrity at the dinner table has paid tribute to you. That is your blessing. Why don't you answer the question properly?